STATE V MACK

a court ruling that memories recovered under hypnosis are not admissible as evidence. This has been known as the per se exclusion rule. This rule banning hypnotically retrieved evidence and does not apply to defendants.

STATE V MACK: "State V Mack is the court ruling that memories recovered under hypnosis are not admissible as evidence."
Cite this page: N., Pam M.S., "STATE V MACK," in PsychologyDictionary.org, April 13, 2013, https://psychologydictionary.org/state-v-mack/ (accessed October 22, 2020).
SHARE