DAUBERT V MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS INC

a case which generates an effective ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1993 stipulating that Federal Rules of Evidence, instead of the limited Frye test, ought to be the criteria used to establish whether or not expert testimonies are admissible.

DAUBERT V MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS INC: "The case of Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. altered the methods by which the court judges expert testimonies forever."
Cite this page: N., Pam M.S., "DAUBERT V MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS INC," in PsychologyDictionary.org, April 7, 2013, https://psychologydictionary.org/daubert-v-merrell-dow-pharmaceuticals-inc/ (accessed October 12, 2019).
SHARE